| Home | About Us | Resources | Archive | Free Reports |
Weekend EditionThe Best of The S&A DigestSaturday, July 7, 2007 But… in 2005 and 2006… subprime lending became the mainstay of the mortgage market. Instead of lending to a few marginal borrowers on the fringe, subprime became the largest single component. The credit quality of the entire industry collapsed – just as a huge wall of money found its way into mortgages. What started out as a good idea turned into a farce… and ended up as a fraud.
Ah… you might say… that's why I only invest in index funds. Doesn't matter. You can't escape the paradox of finance. Any investment idea, no matter how sound, at some point will be ruined if too much capital tries to follow the same strategy.
Index funds were, at one time, a great idea. They allowed you to "piggyback" for free on the handicapping that was done by the majority of other investors, who actively managed their portfolios or who paid for active management. But… as soon as most of the money in the market was "indexed" – which happened in U.S. stocks sometime around 1998 – then you were investing in a farce.
If most of the money in the market goes into indexing, then everyone is buying stocks on the basis of market cap (since indexes are normally weighted by market cap). That means most of the money is going into the most expensive stocks… simply because they're the most expensive. Hopefully you can see that the future returns of a strategy that seeks to buy the most expensive stocks, purely based on price, aren't likely to be good (and they haven't been).
The fraud stage of indexing is now occurring. Funds that are really actively managed and have high fees and costs have begun to call themselves "index funds." Now folks who think they're indexing, aren't.
How do you avoid the paradox of finance? Well… it's difficult for most people. You have to think for yourself. You have to employ your capacity to reason. And… as I'm sure you know… most people would rather do anything but think for themselves.
To start, Jim thinks commodities are the best place to be for the next 20 years. He's particularly bullish on water but says the best way to play it is to buy water-services companies.
On the other hand, he's worried that there are too many speculators and bulls in the gold market. He suggests waiting for a correction to shake them out before getting back in. Likewise, he's sold out of nearly all emerging markets, griping that there are too many MBAs exploiting them. Again, he hopes to buy back in after a correction. The only emerging market Jim didn't sell is China.
Regards,
Porter Stansberry
|
Date Range:7/2/2007 to 7/7/2007
Date Range:7/2/2007 to 7/7/2007
|