| Home | About Us | Resources | Archive | Free Reports |
Weekend EditionThe Best of The S&A DigestSaturday, June 5, 2010 This man was personally implicated in bribing New York state pension officials (but hasn't been indicted yet). He made close to $500 million via his private-equity fund (Quadrangle), while his investors underperformed municipal bonds. This guy lives in a $15 million home on Martha's Vineyard and in the same Fifth Avenue apartment building as George Soros. This is a guy who flies his own plane... whose wife is the leading fundraiser for the Democratic Party. This is Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and Michael Bloomberg's best friend. And Barry Diller's. This guy spent his entire life in the rarified world of Ivy League colleges, investment banks, and New York City's most elite social circles.
And yet... even with all of these advantages, he ended up accused of bribing New York State pension officials to get them to invest with his private-equity firm. (By the way... I have to hand it to OBAMA! on appointing Rattner as the "car czar." OBAMA! knew about the corruption charges, and he appointed Rattner to restructure General Motors anyways. After all, who better to steal from bondholders than a crook?)
And now, Rattner was going to lecture us, the great unwashed, about "income inequality." It was simply unbearable...
Really, it was more of a moan of agony. I just couldn't take anymore. How could such a person ever have been allowed to reach such levels of power and influence? How could an idea as obviously repellant as government-directed income redistribution ever be discussed at an investment conference filled with thousands of capitalists?
This guy is the very embodiment of the term "limousine liberal." He wants to raise your taxes because his income is now all sheltered. And he thinks he knows how to use your money far better than you do. In his mind, he's doing you a big favor when he raises your taxes.
And Rattner knows well the 50% or so of the people who no longer pay federal income taxes will believe income inequality is a problem (instead of the result of a wonderful technological revolution). And they will support every possible measure to correct "the problem." This will keep people like Rattner in power for a long, long time.
How long will the capital markets continue to finance government borrowings that may be refinanced but never repaid on reasonable terms? And second, to what extent can obligations that are not financed through traditional fiscal means be satisfied through central bank monetization of debts – that is, by the printing of money?
What scares me the most isn't that we have a huge fiscal problem, it's that our politicians have come to believe we don't need to balance our budgets, insist on banking discipline, allow companies to go bankrupt, or even require people to pay their debts because we can always print more money. This is how paper money systems have always collapsed. And how great empires have always ended.
The answer is, sovereigns can borrow as much money as they want, safely, as long as they keep at least one year's worth of foreign debt service (principal and interest) in hard currency reserves. The U.S. has about $800 billion in reserves: oil, gold, and euros. We owe foreign creditors roughly $2 trillion in the next 12 months. That's very, very dangerous.
Regards,
Porter Stansberry
|
Date Range:5/31/2010 to 6/5/2010
Date Range:5/31/2010 to 6/5/2010
|